On 23/05/2008, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The evolved Wikipedia house style is a grey stodgy
morass. Some bits
are better written than others, but it's getting noted:
http://www.edexcellence.net/flypaper/index.php/2008/05/wikipedia-enabling-t…
(that's a blog post quoting a book that isn't online)
How to fix this scalably?
Are featured articles are better written than other articles? If not,
requiring it of new featured articles would be a good first step.
As with most things like this, we need to fully investigate the
problem before we can come up with a meaningful solution.