On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Steve Bennett <stevagewp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Carcharoth
<carcharothwp(a)googlemail.com>wrote;wrote:
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Steve Bennett
<stevagewp(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>Here's another: when someone searches for
an article (let's say
"norwegian
antarctic expedition")
Incidentally, I find the following collection of facts rather curious in
their ensemble:
1) "Norwegian Antarctic Expedition" was one of the most requested
redlinks,
with 25 or so hits
Strange.
2) There is a "WikiProject
Antarctica/Norwegian Antarctica work group"
Not that strange.
My perhaps-too-subtle dig: What is the Norwegian Antarctica work group
*doing* exactly, if they haven't written [[Norwegian Antarctic Expedition]],
written about any of the 6+ Norwegian Antarctic expeditions, nor even listed
4 of them on the List of Antarctic Expeditions? Answer: writing about Alien
vs Predator, apparently...
Clearly they didn't write about it (if any WikiProject did, it was
likely the film one). Look to see who tagged the article and when.
I suspect that "Norwegian Antarctic Expedition" is more in the scope
of a history of Antarctic exploration group, and "Norwegian
Antarctica" should redirect to the Antarctic territorial claims of
Norway, and should cover things like:
Whether or not a project or task force has been working on the
articles tagged within its scope is not always immediately clear. many
projects only get as far as the tagging stage. It is easier to build a
list of things to work on than to actually work on them.
Carcharoth