Phil, the
burden of proof is upon you to show that Wikipedia, in its
rules and policies, is "concerned with contributors editing Wikipedia
to further a political agenda."
Read: "[[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]]".
Done. Now you read the mails I'm writing.
In fact, if it
was disallowed, then a
large porition of Wikipedia's users would be banned, including
abuhamza1970 and his opponents. You too, would be banned.
No I wouldn't. My
only agenda in editing Wikipedia is to provide a
neutral encyclopedia.
If you say so..
It is very
unprofessional of you, and others, to accuse abuhamza1970 to be
"furthering a political agenda" when you are also guilty of the same
"crime."
Please, if you think I'm trying to further a political agenda,
provide evidence of your accusations, or take them back. Personal
attacks and libel are not welcome on Wikipedia.
The political agenda you have been advocating on this list is pretty
obvious. I don't have the time to go through all your edits on
Wikipedia, but this one,
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Libertarians_for_Life&diff=pr…40785660,
is pretty telling.
--
mvh Björn