It does not specify which part is fabricated. Even if the whole idea that
wikification could be made compulsory for publication in the JBL is a
fabrication, it is still a recommendation from one author. wikiquote and
wikisophia seem to be the most appropriate venues.
"Scientia Potentia est" <bibliomaniac_15(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:557396.66605.qm@web62507.mail.re1.yahoo.com...
Read the blogpost more carefully.
--- On Thu, 1/15/09,
brewhaha%40edmc.net <brewhaha(a)edmc.net> wrote:
From:
brewhaha%40edmc.net <brewhaha(a)edmc.net
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Journal of Biblical Literature is also requiring
aWikipedia entry
To: wikien-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Thursday, January 15, 2009, 9:53 PM
I do not think the encyclopedia is the best way to promote literature of
this kind. The web? Sure. Everybody on the internet has publishing
capacity
on the web. The encyclopedia is for facts that are really not open to
dispute. wikisources or wikimedia commons seem like more appropriate
venues
if not a USENET newsgroup, like alt.religion.*
"David Gerard" <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fbad4e140901020504w67cf6cf9p76f59248b3cbe31a@mail.gmail.com...
http://ancienthebrewpoetry.typepad.com/ancient_hebrew_poetry/2009/01/new-gu…
> Similar journals are apparently likely
to do the same.
> So. When will this become standard?
> - d.
>
_______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l