On 5/31/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I suggest throwing out notions that "all links to
attack sites shall
be removed", however phrased.
It's a matter of usage, not the mere fact of the
link.
That's been my position of late. It just seems easier and more
reasonable to remove attacks (and hence links used in attacks) than to
leave open an invitation to these disruptive, out of the blue edit
wars arising from someone's application of the letter of the law.