On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:12 PM, George Herbert
<george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Ken Arromdee
<arromdee(a)rahul.net> wrote:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011, wiki wrote:
The notion that what new editors really value is
the ability to participate
in policy discussions, and that any move away from that is "dangerous" is
just more nonsense of the libertine variety. We are building an encyclopedia
- remember that? The rest is just pragmatic sausage making.
Well, I can tell you I left because of a policy decision (well, there were a
whole bunch of things but the policy decision was one of the worst.)
...And a policy discussion which was driven by a small, vocal, and
policy-active minority, who drove a solution upstream against a
consensus gap.
The long term damage that incident did has been consistently shoveled
under the rug.
Which incident are you both talking about? If Ken's user page makes it
obvious, just say that, but I can't immediately remember what you are
both talking about here.
Carcharoth