In message
<31073ef90511281617x7d096a26m53c249a3f1d17e3a(a)mail.gmail.com>om>, Mark
Wagner <carnildo-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w(a)public.gmane.org> writes
Assuming Wikipedia is running along smoothly, an
administrator can
delete one image every twenty seconds, if they don't notify the user
first or remove the image from pages where it's used, and if they do
only the quickest check to see if the image is tagged correctly.
Deleting all these images would take 185 man-hours of effort.
If the administrator removes the image from articles where it's used
before deleting it, it takes about 40 seconds to delete an image.
This increases the effort needed to 370 man-hours.
Just a minute - are you honestly advocating that images should be
routinely deleted without removing links from articles which use them?
Because in that case I STRONGLY object to this attitude. For some time
I've been coming across articles on my watchlist which suddenly have red
image links in prominent places: apart from looking damned ugly, it's
highly give a highly unprofessional impression of Wikipedia. It should
be OBLIGATORY in my opinion for the people deleting images to FIRST
remove the links to them, and hang the extra work involved!