On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 22:19:14 -0700, slimvirgin(a)gmail.com
<slimvirgin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If Geni's interpretation of 3RR is correct, then
we have an unwinnable
game of tic tac toe going on against editors trying to keep nonsense
out of articles. Within four hours:
Skyring inserted a falsehood
Adam reverted: Adam's #1 revert
Skyring re-inserted it: Skyring's #1 revert
Adam reverted: Adam's #2 revert
Skyring re-inserted it:" Skyring's #2 revert
Adam reverted: Adam's #3 revert
Skyring re-inserted it: Skyring's #3 revert
Adam reverted: Adam's #4 revert.
Skyring calls the cops.
As noted above, this is not the case. My insertion was a matter of
fact - namely because the term head of state is not defined in the
constitution it is a matter of contention rather than convention. As
I have demonstrated.
Adam's four reverts took place within a matter of hours, but during
that time we were discussing the issue. Adam became increasingly
abusive when asked to provide checkable sources, I waited twelve hours
and seeing no resumption of the discussion I reported him.
All this can be checked, and that's the beauty of Wikipedia.
--
Peter in Canberra