--- Tom Haws <hawstom(a)sprintmail.com> wrote:
I notice Jamesday
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jamesday> proposed
"...tagging based on quality metrics with no specific print or CD
target. Anyone else could then use those metrics to select articles for
any arbitrary target they desire, with only those selecting for
non-online targets being liable." His context was legal concerns about
an Editorial committee producing a CD or Paper Wikipedia.
Ack! No more blasted meta tages (meaning templates). A smarter system is needed
that does not require an editor to edit or in any way change the content of an
article by using said system.
-- mav
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com