John Bradley wrote:
What personal attacks have I made because I have been
repremanded?
My disgust strtches far further back than that.
When did it start and why?
It also yet again seems that I what I have done is a
personall attack then so
is everyones critisms of me. another example of 1 rule for the arbcommas.
I'm not on the Arbcom, but calling people "stupid immature idiots"
won't
help your case. Talking about "invalid, illogical, unreferenced, biased
claims" in articles might - attack the idea, never the person.
My request for a page to be deleted was not spam, that
several people
have decided to use it as an opportunity to rake over the coals is not my
problem.
What a person has in their user space is their concern unless it breaks
policy (eg. is defamatory, illegal). Many people have pages like this as
watchlists.
Don't forget the disclaimer that you submitted all entries to Wikipedia
under - All contributions to Wikipedia are released under the GNU Free
Documentation License. The history of the mistakes you have made in the
past cannot be erased, but that doesn't mean you have to make them in
the future. Be polite, discuss things, never revert without talking
about what you are doing and why.
--
Alphax
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alphax
There are two kinds of people: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,' and those
to whom God says, 'All right, then, have it your way.' - C. S. Lewis