On 11/28/05, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/28/05, Kelly Martin
<kelly.lynn.martin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
[[m:Voting is evil]]
Kelly
The alturnatives are worse-Churchill
The voteing softwear avoids a lot of the normal downsides of voteing
by not revealing who has voted for what. There is also the issue that
with hundreds of people wanting to have a say it is the only real way
to gage final opinion.
I think Kelly's point loses a lot when taken out of context:
On 11/28/05, Kelly Martin <kelly.lynn.martin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/28/05, Sam Korn <smoddy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
We need consensus? Let's hold a two-week,
site-wide vote with
Concorcet (sp?) voting. And it's going to be binding.
[[m:Voting is evil]]
Kelly
and my email was in response to
On 11/28/05, Anthony DiPierro <wikilegal(a)inbox.org> wrote:
And the community would be completely useless without
the servers.
Somewhere between the two a consensus needs to be reached. The
community can't overthrow the arb com without the support of the
board, and the board can't institute the arb com without the support
of the community.
So you appear to be arguing under a misconception. Kelly may think
voting for ArbCom members is evil. However, she didn't say so, so
don't put words in her mouth.
--
Sam