I think that Jimbo might have sligthly more pressing matters than
investigating himself all disputes on the english wikipedia. He
certainly do cares and would regret a lot that abuse is practiced, but
any investigation takes a lot of time. This is why an arbcom was set. So
that an instance can be delegated power by Jimbo and by the community to
consider such things.
So, for any such issue, you should first of all consider turning to the
arbcom, and trust the arbcom to take the right decision; and see Jimbo
as the final person you can go to when ALL OTHER means have failed (to
your opinion).
Ant
Blair P. Houghton a écrit:
[[Wikipedia:Requests for de-adminship]] says to ask
here, or Jimbo.
Which I guess means Jimbo is the only one who counts.
And he doesn't seem to care that admins aren't paying attention
to the voted-on criteria for blocking users, as it's not sufficient
cause to block an admin.
--Blair
Jack Lutz wrote:
>> What is the usual procedure for having admin privileges stripped in cases
>
>
> of abuse?
>
> Apparently one must make an appeal to ArbCom or Jimbo, though note
> that only
> a few (2?) sysops have lost privileges on EN. See also the proposed
> [[Wikipedia:Requests for de-adminship]].
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
>
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>