On Dec 2, 2007 11:54 PM, Alec Conroy <alecmconroy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Anyway, it's a bit of a dead horse now, since the
other sleuths are
either fictional or permanently silent. But, "Durova didn't say
ANYTHING that would make us think !! might be blocked" on the
Cyberstalking list just isn't realistic-- nobody's gonna buy it, ya
ought not be trying to sell it.
I think a more realistic version is believing that Durova didn't
intend to block YET because she hadn't enough evidence.
There's a difference between 'I think this person is a sockpuppet of a
banned user' and being sure of it. In the former case, you try and
prove or disprove, or simply sit on one's suspicions and let things
unfold.
-Matt