From: David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
JAY JG wrote:
From: David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
>JAY JG wrote:
>>and when it came to the inevitable RfAR
months later (after which the
>>person in question was banned for over a year), none of the evidence
>>presented in the RfC was even considered.
>Er, why not? It would likely have been an
excellent start
>to arbitration evidence. Which case do you mean?
As far as I know none of the evidence in my RfC
re: Alberuni was used in
the actual findings against him.
Ah, okay. Apology on my part for not going looking, that was one of the
earliest cases I looked at.
Note to all bringing RFArs: if you've done an RFC, list it on the
Evidence page *and* explicitly reuse the evidence!
Just to be clear, I was not a complainant in the RfAR against Alberuni. I
explicitly avoided that case for a number of reasons, including ones
mentioned earlier on this list.
Jay.