On Thursday 19 June 2008 08:53, Mike R wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Charles Matthews
<charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
If what the ArbCom says is fundamentally at odds
with the policy the
community wants, the ArbCom surely has to give way.
That's one opinion. Another opinion is that "ArbCom rulings do in fact
hold greater authority than that of mobs, democratic or otherwise."
[
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff=21…
3246&oldid=213262937]
And that would be wholeheartedly wrong.
The community is the only legitimate authority on Wikipedia. The Arbitrary
Committee has no legitimate authority whatsoever.
--
Kurt Weber
<kmw(a)armory.com>