Argis Rohat wrote:
For one thing the sentence states as fact that the
term "Israeli
apartheid" is "historically inaccurate, antisemitic, propaganda, and a
political epithet used to justify terrorist attacks against Israel"
something a wikipedia article should not be asserting. Secondly the
paragaraph is not neutral and strongly weighted with the view that
Israeli apartheid is not an
acceptable term.
Only if you ignore the phrase "The majority of academics and journalists
who have commented on the term are reported to deplore its use on the
grounds that...". It's not the best wording, I agree. Is it better now?
-Gurch