David Gerard wrote:
Blair P. Houghton wrote:
Garrrr! It not roid rage! It justifiable
barbellcide! Garrr!!!
I even spelled out in the talk page that I wasn't being
vituperative. But did anyone read back more than two layers of
comments? Hard to tell.
Take me through this one slowly:
What's so hard about not reverting repeatedly?
I dunno. I didn't revert it. I edited it to make it right. Ask the
guy who reverted it.
Why does it have to go into the article THAT SECOND?
Why does it have to be reverted to wrong information that second?
What bit of the 3RR is ambiguous?
Who said it was? Read my rebuttal. I didn't violate the 3RR.
I look forward to your answers.
I look forward to a little educated forethought on the part of every
self-elected
politician on wikipedia.
--Blair
"Still not being vituperative."