From: Delirium
The Cunctator wrote:
>All right, Votes for Deletion is broken. There's something seriously,
>deliriously wrong when [[Gene Ray]] is listed on Votes for Deletion.
>
>In the same way that we trust users to delete pages that should
>*obviously* be deleted, we should trust users to remove pages from
VfD
>that should *obviously* not be deleted. Entries
that have been edited
so
>that there is no doubt that they should be deleted
should be able to
be
removed
immediately from the VfD page.
What's wrong with just leaving it on the page for 5 days and letting
it
get removed if it's the case that there's
little to no support for
deletion?
What's wrong with putting up every page that should obviously be deleted
on the Votes for Deletion page for 5 days?
How about this: you come up with answers to your question, and I'll come
up with answers to mine.
BTW, do you deny that having [[Gene Ray]] on VfD is a sign of something
seriously wrong?