On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Charles Matthews wrote:
But "bias" of the kind he works with is a
really unhelpful concept for
us, in practice: especially when trivialised by being "metricated".
What other way is there to claim bias than being "metricated"? Is he just
supposed to give his subjective opinion, or just complain that a particular
thing is being left out of the article?