--- Timwi <timwi(a)gmx.net> wrote:
I have thought of another problem. Do they have to be
different admins?
Currently I am not keeping track of who did the approving, so it is
perfectly possible for the same admin to raise the value twice (and this
can happen inadvertently very easily: just accidentally hit the link twice).
Well at this stage I think we can live with that just as we lived for months
with a rollback feature that rolled back *any* top edit (sometimes resulting in
restored vandalism). I'm sure this will get refined more in the future.
But if you feel up to the task and have time, then by all means plunge forward.
Well, this already exists, except it's not a box,
but a link, and it
doesn't say "checked for vandalism", but "mark as patrolled".
:-)
That works. :)
The way I have done it now, the edits are not greyed
out, but instead
unchecked edits are highlighted with a yellow background colour, and
checked ones display as they do now. I thought of greying things out
first, but it looked really rubbish when most of Recent Changes was
marked as patrolled.
OK - that works too.
(watchlists
would be
nice, if that is easy to code, otherwise forget it for now).
Unfortunately, this is not easy, because for some reason the Watchlist
was made to use the 'cur' table rather than the 'recentchanges' table.
I was told that the main reason is that recentchanges only goes back one
week, while people might want to have a Watchlist that goes back
further. In return, the Watchlist displays only the most recent edit
for each page on your Watchlist.
A future feature then.
-- mav
Timwi
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com