--- David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This is carefully, comprehensively wrong. IAR has been
ratified as
policy directly by Jimbo, as a shortcut when process is tying people
up in red tape. It doesn't supersede NPOV or CIVIL. Its "deprecation"
was an attempt at shouting it down by process fetishists.
* "Shortcut (policy)"
#redirect [[Loophole]]
* "Fetishists (process), according to U:DG"
#redirect [[Integrationalists]]
To be taken seriously, a policy needs to (a) obviously
help the actual
task
...Where the "task" is somewhat relativistic, given the context of
Wiki inflationary expansion...
(b) not be a pain in the arse in practice.
Like an inCIVIL or POV application of CITE?
-SV
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com