Charles Fulton wrote:
On the other hand, a fair point is raised. 172 has
abused his admin
powers as thoroughly as can be - and certainly moreso than anyone I've
ever seen in my time here. He UNBLOCKED himself repeatedly, and his
unblocking summaries ("no violation of the 3RR") and ("They did not
look at the content of the last edit, just the edit summary. Now quit
wasting my time. I have one reply to make on talk, then I will go
away") suggest to me that he regards himself above the law.
Nothing wrong with setting the facts straight in the face of 3RR zealots.
Are Featured Articles now functioning as
Get-Out-Of-Jail-Free Cards?
There is some merit in that idea.
Theresa Knott wrote:
>>This deference of the privileged to the privleged is apalling.
>>
>>
>You are missing the point. It's not a question of deference.
>
True that would be an advocacy for elitism. On the other hand there are
others who would be happier if ignorance deferred to ignorance.
>>It might even be a good idea to sunset
>>sysop powers, say every three months (although not all sysops at once) to see
>>if the sysop can get elected again.
>>
>>
>I'm not sure that's a good idea at all.
>
It's a horrible idea that would give the lunatics control of the asylum..
Ec