On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 10:18:44 -0400, Jon Awbrey <jawbrey(a)att.net>
wrote:
Citing cases of "Priority Inversion", in this
case
where a few editors declare their "consensus" as an
excuse for deleting relevant and sourced information.
Why invent a new term for this, especially one which does not actually
appear to bear any relation to the supposed problem?
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG