No, your right to insert the Daniel Pipes POV is removed. That ruling
makes no attempt to affect the right of other users to address Pipes's
viewpoints. Just you.
-Snowspinner
On Nov 28, 2004, at 11:41 AM, Harry Smith wrote:
This does not appear to the be only case of POV
censoring by ArbCom
see the WP:RFAR vs Lance6Wins.
The Daniel Pipes POV is also censored.
Lance6Wins
--- Phil Sandifer <sandifer(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
I'm seriously concerned about a recent
arbcom
enforcement. A ban was
ordered against [[User:C Colden]] as per the ruling
in the case of
Lyndon LaRouche.
C Colden was not a Wikipedia user when the LaRouche
ruling was made. He
was not a party to that case. However, the ruling of
the case,
apparently, was a ruling against the insertion of
"original research
originating with the LaRouche movement" (Which seems
to be an
interchangable phrase with "the LaRouche point of
view") into any
article by any user.
This seems to me to reflect a hard arbcom ruling
that the LaRouche POV
is not something that need be included under the
Wikipedia NPOV policy.
As loathesome as I find the LaRouche movement to be,
I am seriously
troubled by the notion that the arbcom can and will
make blanket
rulings that certain perspectives are not part of
NPOV.
-Snowspinner
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l