On Nov 29, 2007 12:26 PM, Charlotte Webb <charlottethewebb(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/28/07, SlimVirgin <slimvirgin(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
As others have pointed out, the five editors she
discussed it with may
not even realize themselves who they are, because Durova may have
mistaken no objections for positive feedback -- or she may have
thought that feedback about her case study was the same as feedback
about a block. So the implication that there are five editors somewhere
in hiding, letting Durova face the music alone, misses the point that
they may have said X, but Durova heard Y. There is therefore no point
in conducting a witchhunt.
For once, Slim, I hope one of your explanations is correct. Of course nobody will really
know for sure unless they have a generally accurate idea as to what, if anything, was
actually said.
Actually, you do know for sure. Matt said it, Guy said it, Slim said
it, and I'm sure they all "have a generally accurate idea as to what,
if anything, was actually said."