On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 6:37 PM, David Goodman <dgoodmanny(a)gmail.com> wrote:
of the first 4 examples, the first 3 are perfectly
valid content--that
the object it is of wood is relevant to the meaning. The 4th is an
example otherwise-- unless the nature of the fence does for some
reason figure in the story.
You aren't seriously suggesting that "The wand used by Harry Potter is
made of wood from a holly tree" should actually be permitted to be in
the [[Wood]] article, are you? I'd sure remove that if I saw it.