I didn't look it up Ed. I don't do a lot of policing myself and have often
found myself wrong if I don't carefully examine any policy that becomes an
issue. I may once again, in a negative way, sinned by not being fully up to
date on what can and cannot be done. Rooting for you though,
Fred
From: "Poor, Edmund W"
<Edmund.W.Poor(a)abc.com>
Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 10:16:13 -0500
To: <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Subject: [WikiEN-l] Abusive editors
I gave Adam Carr a 15-hour block (for abusive language).
But then I read Fred Bauder's remark that:
* We do not provide for automatic blocking or banning of persons who
make personal attacks.
So once again I hereby "place myself on report".
I had thought that any of the 415 admins, having the "ability" to block
signed-in users, were "authorized" to use that ability to enforce the
rules - such as:
[[Wikipedia:No personal attacks]]
If I'm wrong, then I hope the first thing the arbcom will do is unblock
Adam Carr. In fact, if I'm OBVIOUSLY wrong, than I guess ANY ONE of the
415 admins will reverse the block.
Hmm. This is interesting. Let's see what happens.
Uncle Ed
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l