Re the suggestion that edit count is the only universal metric for success.
Editcount is a very long way from being the only universal metric for
success.
Length of Tenure and cleanliness of block record are just as universal.
Adminship and other userights, are also universal, though I'd concede that
adminship on some projects is seen as easier to get than on others, but then
automated and semiautomated edits are perceived as less worthy than manual
ones.
Featured content is at least Wikipedia wide, though I confess I don't know
wiktionary or Wikisource well enough to know if they have an FA style
system.
I'm pretty sure that Barnstars are universal, though maybe someone could do
a survey of the wikis to check that.
Linguistic skills. Babel boxes are another thing that matter in all our
multingual wikis.
Wikiness is a new one on me -
http://toolserver.org/~erwin85/xcontribs.php?user=WereSpielChequers
I've just come across it in the Stewards elections, so it is both somewhat
specialised and at the same time something that editors from many different
wikis can appreciate and clearly many are judging each other by. You could
argue that it is a function of editcount and linguistic skills, but I think
it more than that as I probably outscore some editors who are far from
monolingual.
Toolserver access and the ability to code are universally valued. As I
believe are various other editing skills.
If you want more I'd suggest creating some modules of Computer based
training, with of course appropriate userboxen for those who complete them
with a high enough score. It would be great to have one for Newpage
patrollers to guide them through the minefield that is speedy deletion
tagging, and there are several other areas where a shift from learning on
the job to learning via a gamelike training modules would raise quality,
reduce angst and I believe greatly reduce levels of newby biting. If we
invested in some for new admins we might even address the two most common
reasons for block histories amongst our most active editors.
WereSpielChequers
I absolutely agree. We keep running into this problem
(edit count as the
only universal metric for success) all over the place.
You mentioned the Wikimedia Labs project (i.e. the Toolserver equivalent),
but I think one thing we could do now would be to go take a look at the
mockup currently built for GlobalProfiles and let engineering staff know
what stats/info you think could/should be included in order to mitigate the
"editcountitis" issue. Note that it's just a proposed design doc, so if
you
agree that we need better indicators of the work people do for the
encyclopedia now's the time to speak up.
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/mediawiki/wiki/GlobalProfile/design
Steven
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l