It seems uncontroversial to suspend the sysop powers
of anyone who is inactive for a prolonged period, on
the understanding that they can get them back simply
by asking.
Mark
--- Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
Christopher Mahan wrote:
--- Mark Richards <marich712000(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:
>I think we don't need to reduce the number, so
much as
ensure
that they are following community made
guidelines. Mark
But if the sysops don't, surely they need to be
desysopped.
Also: people who have been inactive for a while (6
months or more)
should perhaps be desysopped (with cursory
reinstatement if needed).
I've considered that process which I
would call
desysopping without
prejudice. I would have suggested 90 days, but
would not oppose 6
months. This group has done nothing wrong; they
just aren't around.
For re-admission they just need to let us know that
they are back and
active. Some very good people would be a part of
this group.
Ec
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.