On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:09 PM, <WJhonson(a)aol.com> wrote:
In a message dated 8/31/2009 11:47:04 AM Pacific
Daylight Time,
ft2.wiki(a)gmail.com writes:
- WikiTrust might be described as "a way
to see how long an edit
endured
and how much trust it seems to have"; in most users' hands it'll be
"its
colored red/blue so its right/wrong."
- People won't think, they'll assume and rely.>>
-------------------
Interesting to see this by virtue of repetition in our mirrors.
And our pseudo-mirrors who *don't* event state that they mirrored us.
Then after a phrase has been cut from our version due to lack of source,
it's put back in citing a past mirror who hasn't removed it....
Circular.
I found a Wikimania presentation earlier that showed colour coding of
text according to trustworthiness and also rated contributors on a
similar scale. I can't seem to find it again now though.