Delirium <delirium(a)rufus.d2g.com> wrote in part:
I propose instead we continue on the current path:
list stuff that can
be cleaned up on Wikipedia:Cleanup, and list stuff that should be
deleted on VfD. Given that only a small minority of users have
expressed opposition to "deletionism", this seems like the best way to go.
-Mark
The current path is not to keep doing what we have been doing before, but to
continually improve our ways and means. To that end, I propose the following
plan, which incorporates some features of suggestions made by (in alphabetical
order--apologies to those who this always discriminates against): AndrewA,
Angela, Jake, JamesDay, Jimbo Wales, Stevertigo, TakuyaMurata, Viajero (I know I
am missing some folks.)
Core-rules:
1. Wikipedia:Cleanup be separated into 7 weekday-specific files.
2. Each such file have subheaders indicating which week the listings are from.
3. No article be listed on VFD *before* it has spent *at least* three weeks on
Cleanup.
4. No article be listed on Cleanup *longer* than 12 weeks.
5. No article be blanked without the content being moved to talk.
Subsidiary recommendations:
1. Articles on Cleanup declared deletable include link to [[Wikpedia:threatened]].
2. Articles on Cleanup declared stubby include link to [[Wikipedia:stub]].
3. Articles on Cleanup declared otherwise troubled include link to
[[Wikipedia:attention]].
4. Articles on VFD include link to [[Wikipedia:endangered]].
5. Articles on PNA include link to [[Wikipedia:difficult]]
6. Cleanup-Listings have score starting at -4; users can add or decrease the
score by 1.
7. Listings also have deletability-score starting at +4; users adding or
decreasing by 1.
Fair warning, I may reply to my own message to annotate, expand etc. the above.
Respectfully (as ever):
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen (aka Cimon Avaro)