Thanks for taking time out of the conversation with Jay to answer us. If
y'all say you're talking with him, that's perfectly acceptable to me.
There's certainly a precedence for keeping sensitive personal stuff from a
user conduct hearing private.
On 8/27/07, Jimmy Wales <jwales(a)wikia.com> wrote:
Frank Bellowes wrote:
On 8/27/07, Matthew Brown
<morven(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Jay has been communicative in email with Jimbo and members of the
arbcom.
-Matt
Don't members of the project deserve some sort of explanation,
particularly when he is under scrutiny in one ArbComm case and on ANI?
When there is something to explain, we will explain it. Jeez.
If there is no transparency then there is no
ability for other admins
or users to respond (and possibly refute) whatever private
explanations Jayjg may have proffered for his actions. This is not how
an accountable, transparent project works.
Stop trolling. Good grief. We are having a private discussion.
--Jimbo
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l