On Sep 14, 2005, at 11:23 AM, JAY JG wrote:
From: Dan Grey
<dangrey(a)gmail.com>
On 13/09/05, MacGyverMagic/Mgm <macgyvermagic(a)gmail.com> wrote: But
keeping unencyclopedic ones hurts Wikipedia too.
Does it? How?
It reduces the credibility of the project.
Jay.
I would rather have an encyclopedia that has a truly staggering
amount of information but that some people dismiss because it has
some silly articles than a well-respected but heavily incomplete
encyclopedia. If I wanted that, I'd just go to Britannica.
-Snowspinner