to realize
overnight. It's becoming clear to me that by reading the
"Ko rule" into the 3RR I am being led to a different interpretation
than many take from the rule. The Ko rule allows a repeat of a Ko
when progress is made between repeats. That's what I focussed on and
believed to be the letter and intent of the law. Perhaps having the
Ko rule as an analogy in the rule is a mistake.
That analogy fooled me too. The rules for what constitutes three
reverts or not is so unclear that you have to be extremely careful when
editing contentious articles.
I removed the analogy. Anybody who thinks it's useful, please restore.