"It fails our reliable source requirement."-- geni
Wow. Geni that's truly the remark that encapsulates exactly what's wrong
with BLPs, and the irresponsible attitude of Wikipedia.
Nevermind our many biased articles, factual errors, and stuff written from
"reliable sources" (aka tabloid sensationalist hatchet jobs), we can dismiss
the subject trying to set our record straight because it fails our
Scriptural requirement. That's Wikipedia's myopic fundamentalism taken to
its extreme.
Ever considered the requirements just might occasionally be screwed?
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: wikien-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikien-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of geni
Sent: 28 March 2011 12:26
To: fredbaud(a)fairpoint.net; English Wikipedia
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] iCorrect
On 28 March 2011 11:53, Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)fairpoint.net> wrote:
A site, where for $1,000, corrections to one's
Wikipedia article can be
posted:
For $1,000, Site Lets Celebrities Say It Ain't So
https://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/28/world/europe/28icorrect.html?ref=todayspa
per
If you search for Wikipedia:
http://www.icorrect.com/search/node/Wikipedia
I'm just suggesting it as an editing tool.
Fred Bauder
It fails our reliable source requirement.
--
geni
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l