On 31/05/07, Gallagher Mark George
<m.g.gallagher(a)student.canberra.edu.au> wrote:
> The Tersa Nielsen Hayden situation pretty much
demonstrates that
> the attack
> site criteria are not firm or unambiguous.
No, it doesn't. Here, I'll resolve that
question now:
Teresa Nielsen-Hayden's weblog is unambiguously *not* an attack
site. Will Beback suffered a momentary lapse of reason, and
he seriously fucked up in a way that should cause him to blush
continously for the next two weeks.
No indeed. But that anyone could seriously act as though it was
indicates that any policy for mindless mass-removal of links to an
alleged "attack site" is fundamentally flawed and would damage the
encyclopedia. Because that's what actually happened, in practice, not
in theory.
- d.