On Dec 14, 2007 3:29 PM, David Gerard
<dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 14/12/2007, Mathias Schindler
<mathias.schindler(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 8:54 AM, David Gerard
<dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds like
about.com II, or Scholarpedia.
With the difference of Knol being licensed under
CC-BY 3.0
So I see. BIG WIN! That'll make me a fan :-)
- d.
One problem: an article there'll probably have to be viewed as a
self-published source; I don't see Google claiming to exercise any
editorial control. WP:V might see a few disagreements as people try to
alter it to allow reliance on free, signed content.
RR
The article they display uses references. Anything wrong should draw
plenty of feedback and subsequent corrections or clarifications.
Fred