On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 4:48 PM, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 23 March 2012 14:04, Carcharoth
<carcharothwp(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jim_Hawkins_%…
This is a rather broad and (as I've noted) hideously vague proposed
solution to a very specific problem, viz. someone who is apparently
well within notability guidelines wanting an article deleted because
he doesn't have control of it, and is abusive towards anyone who tries
to help.
That's a bizarre statement – and quite untrue – as well as absolutely
appalling PR. I see someone linked to that comment of yours on Hawkins'
Facebook thread yesterday.
http://www.facebook.com/jimhawkinsltd/posts/303015339764646
(Not sure if that link will work for people who aren't on Facebook.)
As for notability, Carcharoth posted a salient analysis of the article's
sourcing:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArticles_for_deletion…
Andreas