"Steve Bennett" <stevagewp(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b8ceeef70908020616j742cfe6es9f1d6b7fa04b386f@mail.gmail.com...
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 1:37 AM, David
Gerard<dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Efforts like the Wikipedia Selection for Schools
are important to help
too (and feed into 0.7 and 1.0). Remember, that's a real actual
encyclopedia DVD being used in actual schools and hugely popular with
teachers, based on all our hard work over the years.
*nod* Still working my way around the Wikipedia 1.0 stuff. There's so
much of it, and not that well organised yet. But my point stands - we
should really have a way of focusing efforts on the important articles
first. Instead of "random article" we should have a weighted average
thing that is more likely to send you to a high priority article.
Or something.
... See if the bot's author put
weight ON articles in a selection process. The bot has tasks other than fact
checking, which is really the most demanding task, so I think notbot might
like some variety.
_______
Ever notice the best taglines are always someone elses?