The arbitration committee might retain jurisdiction, or at least be able to
reopen the matter in case. They could then impose a hard long ban if really
necessary.
Fred
From: Daniel Ehrenberg
<littledanehren(a)yahoo.com>
Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:26:39 -0800 (PST)
To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Creative Alternatives to Bans
Fred Bauder wrote:
Before a "short ban" would be
considered the editor
would have lost an
arbitration dispute. How about some creative
alternatives to bans as
results? For example, an editor may only be having
trouble in certain areas,
for example, Fred Bauder, should he lose an
arbitration might be forbidden
from editing any philosophy articles....
Fred
Sounds good but how would you enforce that? For most
people that would work, but many trolls would just
ignore it without something like a threat of banning.
LDan
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l