jayjg wrote:
No, I'm just rejecting all attempts to frame this
as something it
isn't. It's been a veritable straw man army today, but I will not let
even one pass.
Except for your own, that is. I, too, am rejecting all attempts to
frame
my arguments as something they aren't. You are deliberately trying to
avoid the core issue of the debate, being that, while there is certainly
consensus for common-sense removal of links to actual personal *attacks*
(and related content such as the personal identity of users), the
consensus for outright bans to entire websites just isn't there, and for
good reason.