On 9/11/06, Steve Summit <scs(a)eskimo.com> wrote:
And then there's the related case of
photographs taken "under
direction" (my camera, my idea, but you held it and pushed the button).
This has a sort of "work for non-hire" feel to it, and I'm sure
it's been discussed at length, too.
I don't think it has been discussed, and such images have been deleted
in the past -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Minneapolis_meetup_2005.jpg
I guess such images are fair use if you never asked the person using
your camera to license the image.
Hang on, hang on, wait a second. It is yours. I'm assuming you asked someone to
take your picture, that person did so, and then handed the camera back to you.
With the sole copy of the "work" inside it.
Without comment.
The understanding is obvious, by common practice. The "release" is given. No?
Really, are we going just a bit overboard here?
Dan