At 04:25 PM 12/7/2004 -0800, Mark Richards wrote:
You can document what other people have said about
these things (moon hoax, reptilian humanoids, flat
earth etc) as long as it is in the context of
reporting what someone has claimed.
Mark
This exact same issue came up on Talk:Freemasonry just a few weeks back,
discussing what to do when Masonic secrets wind up on Wikipedia, and this
is the solution that I proposed there too. I expect that someday when the
[[Masonic rituals and practices]] (or whatever) article gets written it'll
be mostly "Author A says X in book N, and Author B says Y in book M. Both
of them say P, but they differ on Q." The credibility and credentials of
the various sources would have to be discussed too.