On 2/27/07, Marc Riddell
<michaeldavid86(a)comcast.net> wrote:
on 2/26/07 10:24 PM, geni at geniice(a)gmail.com
wrote:
Knocking out even 10 of the hyperactives would
lead to serious
problems unless you can find replacements (and if you can could you do
so now? The backlogs are getting anoying again).
Are you saying that the quantity of the product is more important than the
quality of the people? If so, that type of thinking is what has seriously
contributed to the cancer in the culture.
I'm saying that if you want a situation where the maintenance side
continues to remain in any way shape or form under control you cannot
afford to follow any course that would result in the loss of the
hyperactive admins.
This is simply a description of the current sitution.
How may "hyper-active" admins are there? And if I'm following things
corrects (and maybe I'm not), it seems that you're assuming that these
hyperactives are likely candidates for losing their admin status. Am I
right about that?
-Rich