On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:00:49 +0530, "Relata Refero"
<refero.relata(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I personally don't intend to follow the links back
and try and analyse times
of votes and blocks and who agreed with what and other such nonsense. But I
dare say someone might. It might be obvious, or it might not. I would have
thought that it would be best if the obsessive weren't given further reason
to obsess.
They don't need any reason, they never did.
> There are no secret courts. There is no erroneous
ban. !! was
> unblocked after 75 minutes. It was a mistake, made out of excess of
> zeal.
Guy, you ignored the point I made earlier. There is a
difference between
this and IRC or arbcom-L. The difference is that you all already believe in
Bigfoot, to quote the principle NYB suggested at the RfAr.
No, what we believe in is the stalking of Wikipedians - particularly
those admins involved in banning certain users. We have very good
evidence for this.
I do not believe in conspiracy theories or Bigfoot. I especially do
not believe in conspiracy theories where I am supposed to be one of
the conspirators. I am thinking of renaming the list grassy-knoll-l
out of irony.
I do believe in ban-evading abusers of Wikipedia because I have
blocked more of their sockpuppets than I can count.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG