>Firstly, there's the issue of inflamatory
userboxes. It appears that> >userboxes supporting American troops in Iraq are
acceptable, but userboxes> >supporting the Iraqi insurgensy aren't. Userboxes
supporting the killing of> >Iraqi insurgents are acceptable, but ones that support
the killing of> > American troops aren't. Surely both the "support"
ones should be acceptable,> >whilst the ones that support killing should be delete.
Then there's the ones> >that advocate peodophilia. Users who have these often
argue that we accept> >homosexual userboxes, which is just a stupid argument, but
they don't seem> >to be able accept that. >The answer is, of course, to ban
all such userboxes and be done with>it. Trying to decide what it is and isn't
acceptable to express>support for is just asking for trouble.
Or, of course, to accept them all. As long as the userboxes dont actually *kill* troops,
or *engage in* paedophilia, there are no policies against it, are there? We shouldn't
have *any* bias here, pro- or anti- anything.
_________________________________________________________________
Get Hotmail on your mobile, text MSN to 63463!
http://mobile.uk.msn.com/pc/mail.aspx