JAY JG wrote:
From: Timwi <timwi(a)gmx.net>
You are asserting that "what we have now
works fine" even though I
have already mentioned numerous times why I think it does *not* work
fine. I have provided what I think is a compelling reason to change in
the first place.
Your argument boils down to this; it's not working fine because I think
the bar is set too high.
Not quite. I don't just "think the bar is set too high". I think that
there are many people who should be admins, but aren't BECAUSE the bar
is set too high. The high bar is the cause of the problem; the resultant
problem is having good folks not be admins.
and we have
rather few good admins as a result (500 out of 25500, less
than 2%).
Ah, but how many regularly active editors? Probably no more than 1000.
Ah, but how many regularly active admins? Probably no more than 20.
Timwi