Charles Podles (charles.podles(a)gmail.com) [050129 01:39]:
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 00:01:43 +1100, David Gerard
<fun(a)thingy.apana.org.au> wrote:
> (Though that raises the question: what does a
stub need *first*: references
> or more text? Both, obviously, but pick one.)
References. A stub with references is simply easier to
expand than one
without: a difficult part of the research necessary to a good article
(i.e. finding good sources) is already taken care of.
Excellent point. Though a stub with {{unrefenced}} *and* {{stub}} looks a
little overwhemled and may not have the desired effect, i.e. suggesting
someone fix it.
- d.