I strongly agree that articles on X in popular culture [etc] are
better than extensive sections in the general article, but it's usual
to collect material in broad topics until there's enough for more
specific articles. In such a general article, it would best be worded
as representative examples of various specific woods being used per
the spirit of summary style. And those who oppose such content oppose
it no matter where it goes.
An article [[Wood in folklore and tradition]], as
suggested, could
refer to the ones mentioned above, in a section about "magical" or
fictional objects made of wood.
However, I do agree that it has no place in [[Wood]] as such. The
topic is much too broad to warrant such minute details.
Magnus
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG