Daniel Mayer wrote:
poll that would make a 3-revert per day limit
policy has 45 votes to 6 [68]
Jimbo has not decided yet whether to allow admins the ability to block users
for 24 hours for breaking this rule.
I'd like to lobby for this to happy ASAP. The rule has a massive
majority (nearly 90%), and we need some way of enforcing it. It should,
hopefully very quickly, become simply unacceptable to revert any one
article more than 3 times in a day. Once you've wrangled back and forth
a few times, you stop. There is really no justification at *all* for a
revert-war going on for longer than that---it accomplishes absolutely
nothing.
What a minute!
When *I* voted on that poll some week ago, the poll was about whether
there should be a *guideline* that reads "do not do more than three
reverts" or not. Nowhere on that page did it say that the poll really
was about whether to allow admins to block a user that reverts three
times or not.
Many of the 51+ persons that has voted probably did not either
understand that the vote was about bannings. If that is what the vote
is about and not just a guideline.
BL